Mathematics Education on the arXiv?

July 25, 2013 — 16 Comments

I’ve recently finished coauthoring two different math education papers. Both papers have been submitted for publication. Neither paper is likely to change the world, but I still want to openly share what we have. Like most mathematicians, I’ve posted my pure mathematics research articles on the arXiv. In case you don’t already know, the arXiv was started in 1991 as an electronic archive and distribution server for research articles. Covered areas include physics, mathematics, computer science, nonlinear sciences, quantitative biology, and statistics. Readers can retrieve papers off the arXiv via their web interface and authors can submit articles (and resubmit if they make changes). It is standard practice for mathematicians to post their articles on the arXiv prior to submitting them for publication. In fact, some articles only appear on the arXiv. When I want to find a particular article, I first look for it on the arXiv. In short, the arXiv is awesome.

However, when I went to go look for a mathematics education category, I was surprised to see it was not among the list of mathematics categories. The math.HO – History and Overview category lists mathematics education as one of the possible topics, but it doesn’t appear to be commonly used for this purpose. In contrast, there is an active physics education category.

After exploring this a little further, it doesn’t appear that there is a culture among math ed folks to use pre-print servers like the arXiv. I think this is unfortunate and I’d like to help change this. If there is going to be cultural shift, I believe that there should be a dedicated place for math ed papers. Authors need to know where to submit papers and readers need to know where to look. A category called History and Overview doesn’t cut it in my view. A precedent has been set by the physics education crew and we should follow in their footsteps. I’d also like to point out that Mathematics Education is listed as one of the American Mathematical Society’s subject classification codes, namely number 97.

I have two proposals:

  1. The category math.ED – Mathematics Education be added to the arXiv.
  2. Math ed people start posting to the arXiv (when copyright allows it).

A couple days ago, I contacted the arXiv about the first item and here is their response:

The creation of a new subject class requires considerable support from the community that will use it. We do not want to create subject classes that will be useless because of under use.

More precisely, we require a commitment from a significant group of researchers to submit papers using the proposed subject class. This should include promises to submit a number of initial papers to get the subject class going (a solution to the chicken-and-egg problem).

If this issue is important to you then you must first start by canvassing support from your community. If you receive overwhelming support, and have a significant number of researchers who have agreed to use arXiv, please feel free to contact us again with more specific information.

I then followed up and asked for clarification about what “overwhelming support” and “significant number of researchers” means, to which they replied:

Overwhelming support would include quite a number (more than, say 50) prominent researchers who agree that such as category should be added, and who would agree to make use of it.

Okay, that sounds like a lot of people to try to get on board, but I say, let’s go for it. One obvious question: what’s the best way to gather interest and then record this interest to the arXiv? Would a petition be sufficient?

In the arXiv’s first response to me, they also said:

We also need a volunteer to moderate the class by reviewing daily submissions and flagging inappropriate submissions. This moderator should also review a significant number of already archived papers, looking for submissions that can be cross-listed to the new subject class and contact authors encouraging them to do so.

I don’t think I am the appropriate person for this and I’m not really willing to take it on anyway. Any volunteers?

Update, July 27, 2013: There is now a petition on Change.org. If you are in favor of the arXiv including math.ED – Mathematics Education as a category, please sign the petition. If you would also utilize this category by uploading articles related to mathematics education, please leave a comment (on the petition) indicating that this is the case. You can find the petition here.

Update, July 28, 2013: We’ve exceeded 100 signatures on the petition to get math.ED – Mathematics Education added to the arXiv. The next step is to round up 2–3 volunteers to help moderate category submissions. I don’t think this requires a tremendous amount of work. I’d like to have a list of potential moderators before I contact the arXiv again. Any takers? After all is said and done, there is no guarantee that the mathematics subject board at the arXiv will approve our request. However, they asked for support from at least 50 people and we have 100. Fingers crossed.

Dana Ernst

Posts Twitter

Father of two boys, husband, mathematician, cyclist, trail runner, rock climber, and coffee drinker. Columnist for MAA blog Math Ed Matters.
  • “Math ed people start posting to the arXiv (when copyright allows it).”

    Before you submit an article for publication, you own copyright, and no publisher can stop you from putting the paper on the arXiv.

  • Hey, Dana;
    Count me in as a supporter of the idea. I have a couple math ed papers in zygote stage (relating to my work in Kenya) that I’d be happy to submit to the arxiv once they’re ready. I agree that a free, common repository of math ed preprints would be quite helpful.

  • Dana, I don’t have strong feelings about this either way. As a Ph.D. in mathematics, I know about the arXiv, but as a practicing mathematics educator, I don’t use it.
    If someone wanted to make this idea gain steam, I think the RUME group would have the people for that, since they tend to be closer to the mathematical community than is the typical mathematics educator, who may be housed in a college of education and not “raised in the tradition” of the arXiv.

  • David, one of the reasons that I made the comment about copyright is that some math ed people have expressed concerns about this. They’ve claimed that some of the math ed journals explicitly forbid posting to things like the arXiv and personal webpages. I haven’t actually looked into this, so you might be right.

  • I too was surprised to find that no such category existed when I went to post an article. I ended up putting it in the nearest matching research subject, where I’m sure it was not particularly wanted. I think the arxiv culture hasn’t been there within math ed circles in the past, but that it’s time now. Let’s do it!

  • Tom, Matt, and Sam, thanks for your comments! Matt, your suggestion about contacting RUME is a good one.

  • Hi Dana — you have my support on this, and I would potentially be interested in being a moderator. I would prefer not to be the only one though — presumably it’s possible to have a group of moderators who share the responsibilities (e.g. one week on, one week off)?

    I will have a think on whether I have anything that could be a contributing paper, I (along with my wife who’s a teacher) have a fair set of notes that could conceivably become a paper.

    Finally — if you would like me to put this out to the writeLaTeX community, let me know whether it’s this blog post you’d like sharing or a petition (if that’s the route you go down).

    Best,
    John

    • John, thanks for your support. I think a small committee to moderate is probably the way to go. I would love it if you could bring the issue to the writeLaTeX community! For now, I guess pointing people to this post is the way to go. Perhaps, we should start a petition.

  • Thurston’s article (http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0503081v1) should of course go in a math ed category of the arXiv, if it is created. I’d love to see its creation, but I don’t do enough with math ed to be really involved.

  • I just set up a petition on change.org. If you are in favor of the arXiv including math.ED – Mathematics Education as a category, please sign the petition. If you would also utilize this category by uploading articles related to mathematics education, please leave a comment (on the petition) indicating that this is the case. You can find the petition by going here.

  • Barry Cherkas

    I think it is a great idea. I don’t have any current papers to submit but I too am a mathematician doing research in math ed and if this happens, I will be happy to submit…and use the resource.

  • Thanks Barry!

  • Another group who might be interested in supporting this initiative might be the ALM (Adults learning Maths) Their website is here:
    http://www.alm-online.net/

  • Hi. I am the chair of the math advisory committee for the arXiv. This would be the committee that approves a new category in the math arXiv. What I can tell you at this stage is that the “petition” that I would like to see is enough postings to math.HO to justify a separate math education category. Creating a separate category first just in the hope that it will attract interest hasn’t usually worked well in the past.

    Another possibility is to change the name of the math.HO category to better reflect its purpose. That’s a more welcome option than multiplying the list of categories.

  • Greg, thanks leaving your comment. I’m fine with pursuing which ever option works out best for everyone. If that means modifying the existing math.HO, then let’s pursue that. Do you have a possible title change in mind? If creating a new category is the way to go, then I’ll do my best to try to get people to start submitting to math.HO.

  • Yes. I would rather negotiate a change to the name of a category in private. However, I can say that the name “History and Overview” has never been all that great of a fit for the topics listed with it, so a name change of some kind could make sense. Of course those topics don’t just include math education, but also closely or loosely related topics such history of mathematics and recreational mathematics.

    In any case, “a rose by any other name would smell as sweet”. Getting more math education submissions to the current math.HO is partly a separate matter. I’m certainly all for more encouragement of that. Again, we can discuss techniques in private.

    Getting a moderator for math.HO is also a good idea; once again, we can discuss.